Initially, there was little reaction to the publication of the
“bible” article. Then, in April 1876, an anonymous review was
printed in The Edinburgh Courant, the author of which
expressed his worst fears for the spiritual welfare of those members
of the public who might now freely read such views as Robertson
Smith had expressed. The writer, generally acknowledged to be Dr A.
H. Charteris, professor of Church History at Edinburgh University,
was a highly orthodox member of the established church. At the time,
Robertson Smith together with his friend, the painter George Reid,
unsuspecting were on a journey through the Netherlands, Belgium and
Germany. Together they kept an illustrated travel-diary which later
came to be printed in a private edition as Notes and Sketches.
Accompanying the pair were Robertson Smith’s two youngest sisters,
Alice and Lucy, who were to stay in Germany to complete their
education.
The Courant article soon stirred up a hornet’s nest. The College
Committee met and, as it wished to have the matter resolved as
quickly and quietly as possible, Robertson Smith was asked to
apologise and publish a recantation. This he refused to do and a year
later, at the May General Assembly of 1877 – for the wheels of the
Presbytery turned very slowly – he demanded that formal charges (a
“libel” in church law) be laid against him so that he might defend
himself adequately against the imputation of heresy. This resulted in
his lectureship being temporarily withdrawn. Fundamental hotheads of
those in favour of a heresy trial were Dr James Begg, a man of
uncompromising Presbyterian orthodoxy, and Sir Henry Wellwood
Moncreiff, leader of the so called Highland Horde and an eminent Free
Church expert in ecclesiastical law. It was the latter’s request to
keep up the banner of the righteous. Robert Rainy, Principal of the
Edinburgh Free Church College, initially avoided taking sides and made
genuine efforts to reach a compromise but ultimately was to withdraw
his support from Robertson Smith.
Apart from the general charge of expressing “unsettling” opinions
which cast doubt on the divine authority and inspired character of
the Bible, eight separate counts laid against Robertson Smith, all
relating to his expressed views on the biblical text. After lengthy
preparation the first public trial was held at the Free Church
General Assembly - supposed in Glasgow - during May, 1878. A large
audience was present in view of the enormous level of public
interest in the affair. No decision was made, however, and the case
dragged on. Though popular opinion, be it minister, be it flock,
seemed to be strongly on the side of Robertson Smith, the more
conservative members of the Free Church had no intention of
conceding defeat and repeatedly postponed any final, definitive
vote. One by one, the specific counts were dropped until only that
relating to the date and authorship of Deuteronomy remained.
Finally, after three years on May 25, 1880, the Assembly formally
cleared Robertson Smith of heresy but agreed that he should be
cautioned to abstain in future from expressing “incautious or
incomplete public statements”.
Nevertheless, peace was to reign only briefly within the Free Church.
Soon after this apparent victory for the Robertson Smith cause, the
next volume of EB9 was released from the printing press. It contained
a further article from Robertson Smith’s pen, “Hebrew Language and
Literature”, which confirmed the author’s unchanged critical view
concerning the history of the origins of the Old Testament. This was
to prove simply too much for the orthodox believer. The young
professor was accused of dishonesty, irrespective of the fact that the
new volume had been prepared for printing well before the conclusion
of the trial. After an Assembly debate in 1881, Robertson Smith was
dismissed at the end of May from his professorial chair at the Free
Church College of Aberdeen.
If that verdict and the loss of his teaching work seemed to represent
complete defeat for Robertson Smith, subsequent history was to
demonstrate that the true victory was his. By the end of the century,
the principles of biblical “higher criticism” were fully accepted by
virtually all British theologians and their findings freely
communicated. Even within the Free Church itself there came a more
liberal view of such matters. Greater freedom of expression was
allowed in both pulpit and college lecture rooms, without detriment to
religious faith. And, one might add, the Scots people felt rather
proud of their young, brilliant fellow-countryman whose sharp mind and
polished argument had enabled him to stand firm against the weight of
the clerical establishment.
During the first months of 1881 Robertson Smith delivered on
invitation of sympathetic friends within the Free Church a series of
extremely popular and well-attended public lectures in both Edinburgh
and Glasgow on bible criticism in relation to the Old Testament. These
were rapidly published in book form under the title The Old
Testament in the Jewish Church (second edition in 1895, translated
into German in 1894) and formed his first authoritative publication in
this field.
A year later, following a second, equally successful lecture series,
The Prophets of Israel and their Place in History to the Close of
the Eighth Century B. C. was published (second edition in 1895,
more editions until now). Thereafter Robertson Smith’s interest was to
turn increasingly to the field of comparative religion.